|
The
Peruvian General Elections in 2006
After the turmoil of
2000 and the elections of 2001, the 2006 election in
Peru was a generally peaceful affair without the
necessity of international observers such as former
president Carter of the United States, to attest to its
validity. Ultimately won by Toledo, turmoil had
decreased in the years precluding the 2006 elections
although economically many problems remained for the
candidates in 2006 to address.
The main candidates in
2006 were:
1) Lourdes Flores Nano,
former congressional representative and conservative
candidate represented Peru's National Unity (UN) party.
2) Ollanta Humala, a
retired soldier and staunch populist was the leftist
candidate of the Union for Peru Party.
3) Alan García, president of Peru from 1985 to 1990, who
represented the center-left American Popular
Revolutionary Peruvian (Aprista) Party.
Minor candidates
included Alberto Fujimori, despite the fact that he
faced criminal charges in Peru and a ban from office
until 2010 was in Chile, and Valentín Paniagua of the
Center Front party who served briefly as interim
president after Fujimori's resignation.
Lourdes Flores Nano,
considered the election's pro-business candidate, had an
early lead in polls. However, as the election approached
Humala overtook Flores Nano in the polls. Humala, by
fashioning himself as a nationalist, tried to avoid his
perception as a leftist. Yet, Humala welcomed the
endorsement of Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez sparking
fears in Peru and world markets that Peru would be the
next Latin American country to move far to the left.
Following Chavez's announcement of his support for
Humala, Peru briefly withdrew its ambassador from
Venezuela accusing García of interference in Peru's
internal affairs. García was running a close third
behind Humala, although he had yet to take a clear
stance on issues and suffered from the perception that
he left the country in economic shambles and plagued by
rampant guerilla violence when he left office.
The most pressing
issue in the election was the question of foreign
investment. Humala favored limiting investment in the
mining, oil, and natural gas industries. In contrast,
Flores Nano pledged herself to maintaining a "free
market" and respecting existing contracts. García, as
mentioned, made few notable policy statements and seemed
to be assuming a role as a middle of the road
alternative. An important second issue was the
allocation of public funds; that is, how Peru's future
government would allocate its growing revenues? In the
opinion of many, despite a surge in demand for Peru's
gold, minerals, and foodstuffs; the Peruvian federal
government had yet to implement effective policies for
distribution of these new funds to the populace and
living conditions for most Peruvians remained
unimproved.
The first round of the
election was not decisive causing a second round run-off
between Humala and García as an apparent choice between
the left and center left. The result was a second round
victory (52.6% to 47.4%) for Alan García. In congress:
the Peruvian Aprista Party obtained 36 seats, the
Peruvian Nationalist Party claimed 23 seats, the Union
for Peru ended with 19 seats, National Unity had 15
seats, and the Fujimorista Alliance for the Future won
13 seats. |